Darrell L. Gaines - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and            
          this opinion should not be cited as authority.                              
               In a notice of deficiency mailed on April 13, 2001,                    
          respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner’s Federal income           
          taxes and imposed penalties as follows:                                     
          Year      Deficiency    Sec. 6662 Penalty    Sec. 6663 Penalty              
          1993       $9,177              ---               $6,882.75                  
          1994        5,701          $1,140.20              4,275.75                  
          1995        4,172             834.40              3,129.00                  
               Different amounts are asserted in respondent’s amended                 
          answer.  After discovery of unspecified errors in the                       
          calculations of those amounts, the parties agree that, as                   
          properly computed, the deficiencies and penalties here in dispute           
          are as follows:                                                             
          Year      Deficiency     Sec. 6662 Penalty   Sec. 6663 Penalty              
          1993       $6,952              ---               $5,214.00                  
          1994        6,147          $1,282.00              4,808.00                  
          1995        6,824           2,103.00              7,887.00                  
               The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioner                   
          underreported his income during each year in issue; and, if so,             
          (2) whether the underpayment of tax required to be shown on                 
          petitioner’s return for each year is due to fraud or, for 1994              
          and 1995, as an alternative to fraud, whether the underpayment of           
          tax required to be shown on petitioner’s return is due to                   
          negligence.                                                                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011