Robert M. Galvin and Christine Galvin - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          liabilities for the years in issue was based upon income and                
          expense figures provided by petitioners and was computed under              
          the guidelines provided in the Internal Revenue Manual.  We                 
          reviewed respondent’s computations and conclude that they are               
          reasonable.  McCorkle v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-34;                  
          Schulman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-129.                              
               The passage of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring              
          and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3462(a), 112 Stat.            
          764, which added section 7122(c) to the Code, resulted in the               
          issuance of new regulations substantially changing offer-in-                
          compromise procedures found in section 7122.  The traditional               
          grounds for compromise had been doubt as to liability and doubt             
          as to collectibility.  Sec. 301.7122-1(b)(1) and (2), Proced. &             
          Admin. Regs.                                                                
               Offers in compromise can now be considered for the                     
          “promotion of effective tax administration” if collection of the            
          full amount of the liability creates an economic hardship.  Sec.            
          301.7122-1(b)(3), Proced. & Admin. Regs.  The addition of this              
          category allowed factors such as advanced age and serious illness           
          to be considered to determine if economic hardship existed.  2              
          Administration, Internal Revenue Manual (CCH), sec. 5.8.11.2, at            
          16,385-15.  In addition, the Internal Revenue Service announced             
          it would allow, in appropriate cases, a short-term payment option           
          that gives taxpayers up to 2 years to pay the entire amount                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011