- 10 - which the payments were allegedly made such as “briefing,” “training”, and “dues”. Except for the signature of the individual in charge of collecting those fees (which is frequently that of petitioner herself), however, the receipts do not disclose any information regarding the identity of the payee, the business purpose, or the nature of the expense. Petitioner has failed to provide us any additional credible information that these expenses are related to, or were required by, her business. Accordingly, we agree with respondent’s determination disallowing these deductions. 3. Gifts and Meals and Entertainment Petitioner disputes respondent’s disallowance of $162 and $311 in expenses she incurred for business gifts in 1999 and 2000, respectively. She also claims that respondent erred in denying her deductions for meals and entertainment expenses of $261 for 1999 and $1,114 for 2000. As discussed above, both business gifts and meals and entertainment expenses are subject to the substantiation requirements of section 274(d). See sec. 274(d)(2) and (3). Yet the only evidence petitioner submitted to substantiate her gifts and business meals and entertainment expenditures is receipts on which she has notated “gifts for client” or “meeting with [name of the individual]”. Petitioner has not proffered any information regarding the business purpose of the expenses, her business relationship with the recipient of the gift or the individual entertained, or any other information that wouldPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011