- 4 - After concessions by both sides,2 there are two categories of issues for decision, as follows: (1) Whether respondent’s failure to abate interest for certain time periods constitutes an abuse of discretion. (2) Whether respondent’s interest computations are correct. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated; the stipulations and the stipulated exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. When the petition was filed in the instant case, petitioners, John G. Goettee, Jr. (hereinafter sometimes referred to as John), and Marian Goettee (hereinafter sometimes referred 2 As noted supra, petitioners concede as to interest on underpayments for 1983. Respondent concedes that respondent underabated the amount of interest for the period Oct. 4, 1995, through Sept. 20, 1996. The parties agree that there remain overassessments for 1981 and 1982. Respondent contends that insufficient interest was assessed as to underpayments for 1979, but concedes that no additional amounts of interest are to be assessed against petitioners. Other concessions are discussed infra in connection with the issues to which the specific concessions relate. Respondent concedes that a Rule 155 computation will be necessary. Unless indicated otherwise, all Rule References are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011