John J. Green - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-190;  Williams v. Commissioner,               
          T.C. Memo. 2002-111.                                                        
               Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Court to require a                   
          taxpayer to pay to the United States a penalty in an amount not             
          to exceed $25,000 whenever it appears to the Court that the                 
          taxpayer’s position in such a proceeding is frivolous or                    
          groundless.  Sec. 6673(a)(1)(B).  In Green v. Commissioner,                 
          supra, the Court directed petitioner to review cases in which               
          taxpayers had asserted frivolous and groundless arguments.                  
          Moreover, the Court went on to specifically warn petitioner of              
          the possible imposition of a penalty under section 6673(a)(1)               
          should petitioner continue to advance frivolous arguments in the            
          instant case.  Id.  After citing the cases that had imposed                 
          penalties against taxpayers advancing these types of arguments,             
          including Roberts v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 365, 372-373 (2002),            
          affd. 329 F.3d 1224 (11th Cir. 2003), in which a $10,000 penalty            
          was imposed, the Court stated:  “Petitioner might therefore care            
          to review those cases and consider whether it is in his best                
          interest to persist in advancing such arguments.”  Green v.                 
          Commissioner, supra.                                                        
               The taxpayer’s arguments in Roberts were substantially                 
          similar to the frivolous arguments asserted by petitioner in the            
          instant case.  Despite the warning of this Court, petitioner has            
          continued to assert these groundless arguments.  Under the                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011