Gary R. Greulich - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          timely file his 1992 return, and respondent credited the $7,000             
          payment to an “excess collections” account.                                 
               On May 13, 1998, petitioner filed his 1991, 1992, and 1993             
          returns.  Respondent applied $2,658 of the $7,000 payment to                
          petitioner’s 1992 tax liability, and the remaining amount                   
          remained in the “excess collections” account.  On November 19,              
          1998, petitioner remitted an additional payment of $897.17.                 
          Respondent applied that payment to petitioner’s 1991 tax                    
          liability because his 1992 liability was paid in full.                      
               On November 30, 1998, respondent issued petitioner, inter              
          alia, two letters entitled “Statement of Account”, requesting               
          additional payments for 1991 and 1993.  In a letter to respondent           
          dated December 13, 1998, petitioner requested that the $7,897.17            
          that had been remitted to respondent be credited to his 1991 and            
          1993 liabilities.  Respondent refused to comply with this                   
          direction, and, with the exception of applying $3,555.17 of the             
          payments to the 1991 and 1992 liabilities discussed above, none             
          of the balance was credited to petitioner’s outstanding tax                 
          liabilities.                                                                
               On October 12, 2000, respondent issued petitioner a Notice             
          of Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Right to a Hearing Under IRC            
          6320.  Petitioner timely filed a Request for a Collection Due               
          Process Hearing.  On August 22, 2002, the Appeals officer to whom           
          the matter was assigned issued petitioner the Notice of                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011