- 8 - Under section 6330(c)(2)(B), taxpayers may raise challenges to the existence or amount of their underlying tax liability if they did not receive a notice of deficiency or did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute that tax liability.7 In the course of the Appeals Office proceedings, in his petition filed with this Court, and in his notice of objection to respondent’s motion for summary judgment, petitioner did not raise any legitimate issues regarding his underlying tax liabilities. Instead, petitioner contends that there is no Internal Revenue Code section that makes him liable for taxes.8 We have consistently rejected this type of frivolous, tax-protester argument, and we perceive no reason, nor are we required, to address such contentions. See, e.g., Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417 (5th Cir. 1984); Keene v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-277; Hall v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-267. We also find frivolous and groundless petitioner’s argument that the 7Petitioner received a notice of deficiency for his 1997 taxable year. His remaining tax liabilities are attributable to amounts which were reported on joint tax returns for 1997, 1998, and 1999. We avoid herein whether the self-reporting of taxes on a return constitutes an opportunity to dispute those taxes for purposes of sec. 6330(c)(2)(B). See Horn v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-207. 8In the proceedings before IRS Appeals, petitioner challenged the “existence” of an income tax liability. He stated that he was not disputing the “amount” of the alleged income tax liabilities. Indeed, he repeatedly exclaimed that he would pay the tax liabilities at issue if the Appeals officer showed him the Code section(s) that makes him “liable” for, or requires him to “pay”, income taxes.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011