Rafael M. and Rosario Gutierrez - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 449 (2001).                                     
               Here, respondent has satisfied his burden of production by             
          showing that petitioners’ understatement was substantial as it              
          exceeded the requisite statutory amount.  Petitioners have not              
          established that their failure to pay Federal income tax                    
          liability in full was due to a reasonable cause.  The record is             
          devoid of any reliable evidence in favor of the conclusion urged            
          by petitioners; namely, that the excess bank deposit amount was             
          not subject to U.S. tax.  Petitioners gave inconsistent and                 
          incoherent testimony and failed to comply with the Court’s                  
          requests to have the documents proffered by them properly                   
          translated and certified, so as to render them admissible.                  
          Accordingly, we hold the “reasonable cause” exception                       
          inapplicable and sustain the imposition of the substantial                  
          understatement penalty.                                                     
               We have considered all arguments made by the parties and               
          have rejected those arguments not discussed herein as irrelevant            
          or without merit.                                                           
                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                                  for respondent                      












Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  

Last modified: May 25, 2011