- 14 - spouse had reason to know of the items giving rise to the increased liability and whether she significantly benefited from the unpaid liability. See Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.03(2)(b), supra, 2000-1 C.B. at 449. Mrs. Haggart failed to introduce any evidence to establish that respondent’s denial of equitable relief was an abuse of discretion. Additionally, we found that Mrs. Haggart had reason to know of the disallowed deductions and omitted income. Furthermore, it appears she would have significantly benefited from the unpaid liabilities. As a result, we hold that Mrs. Haggart is not eligible for relief from joint and several liability under section 6015(f). Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011