- 10 - In addition to questioning the authenticity of respondent’s documentation, petitioners have interposed protester arguments which have, on numerous occasions, been rejected by the courts. In order to support their arguments, petitioners have selectively picked phrases out of context from statutes and/or rulings. In so doing, petitioners have chosen to ignore more current or complete statements of the law. Petitioners have ignored the rules and regulations and contend that they are not required to comply with or pay attention to respondent’s letters and determinations. Petitioners’ arguments are superficial and without substance. Under these circumstances we are convinced and hold that petitioners’ position in this proceeding is frivolous and has been interposed primarily to protest the tax laws of this country and/or to delay collection activity by respondent. Accordingly, we hold that petitioners are liable for a $2,000 penalty under section 6673(a)(1). To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order and decision will be entered granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: May 25, 2011