-10- Commissioner, 108 T.C. 430, 443 (1997); DeVenney v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 927, 930 (1985). The fact that the Commissioner eventually concedes a case does not necessarily mean that his position was unreasonable, Sokol v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 760, 767 (1989), but remains a fact to be considered, Powers v. Commissioner, 100 T.C. 457, 471 (1993), affd. in part, revd. in part and remanded on another issue 43 F.3d 172 (5th Cir. 1995). We conclude on the basis of the facts and circumstances at hand that respondent’s position in the administrative proceeding was substantially justified. We believe that the Commissioner acted reasonably in seeking and evaluating information from petitioner and his representatives as to the correctness of the determination reflected in the notice of deficiency. Respondent is entitled to maintain his position until adequate substantiation, including oral testimony, is received and verified. Sokol v. Commissioner, supra at 765. We believe that it was reasonable for the Commissioner to not have conceded the relevant portion of his determination until the meeting between Keegan, Ho, and Farr. All arguments of the parties have been considered. Those arguments not discussed herein have been rejected as without merit. Accordingly, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: May 25, 2011