- 7 - respondent a request for an Appeals Office hearing expired on Monday, November 13, 2000. See sec. 7503 (dealing with time for performance of acts where last day falls on Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday); see also sec. 301.6330-1(c)(2), Q&A-C3 and Q&A- C4, Proced. & Admin. Regs.; cf. sec. 301.6320-1(c)(2), Q&A-C3 and Q&A-C4, Proced. & Admin. Regs. Petitioner contends that the 30-day period did not expire on November 13, 2000, because he was granted an extension by Revenue Officer Chivers. Respondent concedes that on November 13, 2000, Revenue Officer Chivers informed petitioner that he was granted a 30-day extension of time to file a request for an Appeals Office hearing. Petitioner subsequently filed his request for an Appeals Office hearing with respondent on December 14, 2000. In Kennedy v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 255, 262 (2001), we held that the Commissioner is not authorized to waive the time restrictions imposed in section 6330. Consistent with Kennedy v. Commissioner, supra, Revenue Officer Chivers was not authorized to extend the period within which petitioner was authorized to file a request for an Appeals Office hearing. It follows that petitioner’s request for an Appeals Office hearing, filed with respondent on December 14, 2000, was not timely. See Schake v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-262 (taxpayer’s allegation that he was given a grace period by Court personnel to file collection review petition would not serve to extend statutory period forPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011