Lavonne Allen Hodgson - Page 2

                                         -2-                                          
          respondent’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 121 and to              
          impose a penalty under section 6673.  Petitioner responded to               
          respondent’s motion under Rule 121(b).                                      
               We shall grant respondent’s motion for summary judgment and            
          shall impose a $5,000 penalty against petitioner.  Section                  
          references are to the applicable versions of the Internal Revenue           
          Code.  Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and           
          Procedure.                                                                  
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioner’s liability was determined by this Court in our             
          opinion Hodgson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-70.  In                    
          addition, on October 19, 2000, the Court rendered an oral opinion           
          against petitioner with respect to respondent’s proposed levy to            
          collect petitioner’s 1994 tax liability.  The Court held in the             
          oral opinion that respondent could proceed with the collection              
          action as determined in the notice of determination.                        
               On December 3, 2001, respondent mailed to petitioner a                 
          Letter 3172--Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Right to            
          a Hearing (lien notice) for 1994.  Enclosed with the lien notice            
          was a copy of Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process              
          Hearing.  On January 9, 2002, respondent received from petitioner           
          Form 12153 requesting the hearing regarding the lien.                       
               On April 3, 2002, a hearing was held between respondent’s              
          Appeals officer and petitioner.  At the hearing, the Appeals                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011