- 9 - Petitioners also paid another attorney, Janet Brown, and two reporting services, Bryant Court Reporting Services, Inc., and Associated Reporting & Transcription, for services rendered in connection with the malicious prosecution suit. Prior to the years in issue, petitioners were involved in various bankruptcy proceedings, both in their individual capacities and with respect to their status as partners in Tara, the investment discussed above. Prior to and during 1995, petitioners employed an attorney, Robert Willis, to bring a malpractice suit against a law firm which had represented petitioners with respect to their investment in Tara, the bankruptcy of Tara, and petitioners’ own personal bankruptcy. In 1995 and 1996, petitioners hired another attorney, Brian Upchurch, to bring another legal malpractice suit, this time against Robert Willis. Investment Expense While a deduction generally is allowed for interest expense, an individual’s deduction of investment interest is subject to certain limitations, and it generally may not exceed the individual’s “net investment income” for the taxable year. Sec. 163(a), (d)(1); see also sec. 163(h) (disallowing any deduction for “personal interest”). Petitioners argue that the $29,103 “investment” expense listed on their 1995 return arose as follows: Prior to beingPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011