Calvin Earl Humphries - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

          by levy Federal income taxes owing by petitioner for the years              
          1992 and 1994 should proceed.  That determination was preceded by           
          respondent's issuance to petitioner of a notice of intent to levy           
          and of petitioner's right to a hearing in connection with an                
          assessed balance of income taxes and statutory additions totaling           
          $8,349.62, $4,717.20, and $2,881.40, respectively, for 1992,                
          1994, and 1998.  In his petition for review, petitioner did not             
          challenge respondent's determination to proceed with collection             
          for the year 1998.                                                          
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          exhibits annexed thereto, are so found and are made part hereof.            
          At the time the petition for review was filed, petitioner was a             
          legal resident of Houston, Texas.                                           
               An attachment to the notice of determination prepared by               
          respondent's Appeals officer states that, at the hearing,                   
          petitioner "only argues that he did not owe the proposed taxes"             
          and that, under section 6330(c)(2)(B), "none of the three                   
          disputed liabilities are appropriate for consideration as a part            
          of the Request for Collection Due Process Hearing".  The                    
          statement also states that "joint liability" was not at issue,              
          that collection alternatives were not offered, and concludes that           
          collection activity could proceed.                                          
               As noted earlier, petitioner did not challenge the                     
          determination for the 1998 tax year in his petition to this                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011