- 3 - Petitioner challenged the imposition of the additions to tax to this Court. On January 25, 2001, the Court in an opinion sustained the Commissioner’s determination with respect to the additions to tax. Hunt v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-15. On September 18, 2001, respondent issued a notice of final determination disallowing petitioner’s claim for interest abatement for 1982. Petitioner filed a timely petition and an amended petition for review of respondent’s failure to abate interest. Discussion Where the Commissioner abuses his discretion in failing to abate interest under section 6404, this Court may order abatement. Sec. 6404(h)(1). In order to prevail, a taxpayer must prove that the Commissioner exercised this discretion arbitrarily, capriciously, or without sound basis in fact or law. Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 19, 23 (1999). In her petitions, petitioner’s only allegation is that respondent abused his discretion by failing to apply section 6404(g). In her petitions and on brief, petitioner relies solely on section 6404(g)(1).2 Section 6404(g) was added to the Code by 2 Sec. 6404(g)(1) requires the suspension of interest if the taxpayer timely files a return and the Secretary fails to notify the taxpayer of the liability and a basis for the liability before 1 year (18 months with respect to taxable years beginning after July 22, 1998, and before Jan. 1, 2004) from the later of (1) the date on which the return is filed, or (2) the due date of (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011