Isaiah Israel - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          income from National Finance Services Co. and that petitioner was           
          not allowed to file a joint return.                                         
               On May 16, 2002, petitioner filed a petition with the Court            
          disputing the notice of deficiency for 2000.3  On October 10,               
          2002, petitioner filed an amended petition, which stated:                   
               1) Notice of deficiency is not the statutory notice called             
               for by code section 6303, 6321, 6331.  2) Code sections 6204           
               6211 6213 only allow for supplemental assessments to be made           
               when an initial assessment is made by the “Secretary” 3)               
               Section 6201 only authorizes the Secretary to estimate a tax           
               or his delegate 4) Section 6501(c) precludes IRS (absent a             
               court order) that petitioner owe any more in Federal tax               
               than the zero shown on the return.  5) by definition Section           
               6211 precludes that a deficiency can exist with respect to a           
               zero return please see page 11 of petitioner answer to                 
               jurisdiction to hear the matter!  6) 6212 - only “Secretary”           
               can send a “Notice” of deficiency  7) 6215 - assessment paid           
               upon notice of demand                                                  
               On June 26, 2002, petitioner filed a petition with the Court           
          disputing the notice of deficiency for 1996 and 1997.4  On                  
          September 16, 2002, petitioner filed an amended petition.                   

               3  The petition was originally filed under sec. 6330(d).               
          Petitioner simultaneously filed with the petition a motion to               
          dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that the                          
          “determination” was invalid because a hearing was not conducted             
          and petitioner was not provided with information that he was                
          entitled to.  Respondent filed a notice of objection, stating               
          that a notice of determination concerning collection actions for            
          2000 had not been issued and no attempts to collect the tax by              
          lien or levy have been made.  The Court denied petitioner’s                 
          motion and ordered petitioner to file a proper amended petition             
          if he wished to contest the notice of deficiency for 2000.                  
               4  The petition was originally filed under sec. 6330(d).               
          Respondent filed a motion for more definite statement.  On Aug.             
          19, 2002, the Court ordered petitioner to file an amended                   
          petition with respect to the notice of deficiency for 1996 and              
          1997 by Sept. 19, 2002.                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011