- 3 - respondent’s Service Center at the time petitioner electronically filed his 1999 Federal income tax return along with the form containing petitioner’s signature. Respondent disallowed the two exemptions claimed by petitioner. Section 151(c) allows a taxpayer to deduct an annual exemption amount for each dependent, as defined in section 152. Under section 152(a), the term “dependent” means, in pertinent part, a son or daughter of the taxpayer over half of whose support was received from the taxpayer. Sec. 152(a)(1). In the case of a child of divorced parents, section 152(e)(1) provides in pertinent part that if a child receives over half of his support from his parents who are divorced under a decree of divorce and the child is in the custody of one or both of his parents for more than one-half of the year, then the child will be treated as receiving over half of his support from the parent having custody for a greater portion of the calendar year. Section 1.152-4(b), Income Tax Regs., provides that the term “custody” is “determined by the terms of the most recent decree of divorce”. Because the divorce decree grants Ms. James full custody of both children, she is considered the children’s “custodial parent” under section 152(e). Cafarelli v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-265. Petitioner, as the “noncustodial parent”, is allowed toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011