JHK Enterprises, Inc., A California Corporation - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
          production, the taxpayer must produce evidence sufficient to                
          persuade the Court that the Commissioner’s determination is                 
          incorrect.  Id. at 447.                                                     
               Section 7491 is effective only for court proceedings that              
          arise in connection with examinations commencing after July 22,             
          1998.  Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of             
          1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3001(c), 112 Stat. 727.  The record             
          here is devoid of evidence showing that the underlying                      
          examination began after the relevant date.  Respondent assumes              
          that petitioner bears the burden of proof, and petitioner does              
          not address this issue.  As previously stated, we have concluded            
          that section 7491(c) does not apply in this case.  But whether or           
          not section 7491(c) applies, respondent has produced sufficient             
          evidence to satisfy the burden of production with respect to the            
          appropriateness of applying the addition to tax.                            
               C.  Analysis                                                           
               Respondent claims that petitioner’s 1995 return was received           
          by respondent’s Fresno Service Center on December 2, 1996.                  
          Respondent argues that petitioner has not produced any evidence             
          that the return was timely filed or that petitioner exercised               
          ordinary care and prudence in filing the return.  Petitioner                
          argues that its 1995 return reflects a signature date of October            
          15, 1996 and was “filed in a timely manner by depositing in U.S.            
          Mail.”  Petitioner also asserts that it filed an appropriate                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011