Vivian C. Kerr - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          important factor is the extent of the taxpayer’s efforts to                 
          assess the proper tax liability.  See Stubblefield v.                       
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-537; sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income              
          Tax Regs.  Section 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs., specifically           
          provides:  “Circumstances that may indicate reasonable cause and            
          good faith include an honest misunderstanding of fact or law that           
          is reasonable in light of all of the facts and circumstances,               
          including the experience, knowledge, and education of the                   
          taxpayer.”                                                                  
               On the basis of the record, we conclude that petitioner is             
          liable for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a).              
          Respondent has met his burden of production under section 7491(c)           
          with the Form 1099-MISC and various checks made by Automotive               
          Emporium during the 2000 taxable year.  We are satisfied that               
          petitioner omitted income from his return for the taxable year              
          2000.  Petitioner failed to provide a reasonable or credible                
          explanation as to why the income was not reported on his income             
          tax return.  Petitioner has not established that the underpayment           
          was due to reasonable cause or that petitioner acted in good                
          faith.  Accordingly, we sustain respondent on this adjustment.              
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                   Decision will be entered           
                                             for respondent.                          








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

Last modified: May 25, 2011