Allen R. Krawczyk - Page 9

                                        - 8 -                                         
          Commissioner, 861 F.2d 131, 134-135 (5th Cir. 1988); see sec.               
          7430(c)(7)(A).  In the present case, respondent did not file an             
          answer to the petition,5 but we note that respondent’s position             
          was essentially the same in the administrative and litigation               
          proceedings.6  More specifically, respondent’s position was that            
          petitioner was not entitled to the head-of-household filing                 
          status, the earned income credit, and two dependency exemption              
          deductions.                                                                 
               Considering all the facts and circumstances, respondent did            
          not know and could not have known that his position was invalid             
          after the petition was filed.  Petitioner’s marital status and              
          the amount of support he provided to his children for the 1999              
          taxable year were unknown to respondent.  See secs. 2(b), 32,               
          151, 152.  On at least eight separate occasions, respondent                 
          requested that petitioner provide documents to substantiate such            


               5  Rule 175(b) provides generally that no answer is required           
          where a petition is filed pursuant to sec. 7463.                            
               6  The motion filed by petitioner seeks only the recovery of           
          litigation costs and not that of reasonable administrative costs.           
          If petitioner had sought to recover such costs, then we would               
          review the Commissioner’s position as of the date of the notice             
          of deficiency to determine whether he was substantially justified           
          with respect to the recovery of administrative costs.  See sec.             
          7430(c)(7)(B).  In the present case, respondent received                    
          information from petitioner in a letter dated Sept. 27, 2000,               
          before the issuance of the notice of deficiency dated Dec. 11,              
          2000.  However, the information provided by petitioner was                  
          insufficient to invalidate respondent’s position.  Accordingly,             
          petitioner would not be entitled to recovery of reasonable                  
          administrative costs.                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011