Wing Y. Kwan - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          a credible explanation as to why the entire business premises               
          were needed for business purposes.  On this record, we uphold               
          respondent’s disallowance of the $4,400 because petitioner did              
          not establish that that amount was an ordinary and necessary                
          business expense paid in 1998.                                              
               As to the accuracy-related penalty, section 6662(a) imposes            
          a 20-percent penalty on the portion of any underpayment of tax              
          attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.            
          Sec. 6662(b)(1).  Negligence is any failure to make a reasonable            
          attempt to comply with the provisions of the internal revenue               
          laws and includes any failure by the taxpayer to keep adequate              
          books and records or to substantiate items properly.  Sec.                  
          6662(c); sec. 1.6662-3(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  Moreover,                   
          negligence is the failure to exercise due care or failure to do             
          what a reasonable and prudent person would do under the                     
          circumstances.  Neely v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 934, 947 (1985).             
          Disregard includes any careless, reckless, or intentional                   
          disregard of rules or regulations.  Sec. 6662(c); sec. 1.6662-              
          3(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.  No penalty will be imposed with                  
          respect to any portion of any underpayment if it is shown that              
          there was a reasonable cause for such portion and that the                  
          taxpayer acted in good faith with respect to such portion.  Sec.            
          6664(c).                                                                    
               On this record, we conclude that petitioner is liable for              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011