Josef and Marie Lah - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
          in the final notice, were $11,035, $4,540, $5,264, and $2,798,              
          for 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993, respectively.  A hearing was held           
          on January 3, 2002.  Subsequently, respondent sent each                     
          petitioner a notice of determination for the years in issue.5               
          Respondent determined that the proposed levy action was sustained           
          because petitioners failed to show that they were entitled to any           
          additional credits or payments, and petitioners were not willing            
          to discuss any alternatives to the proposed levy action.                    
          Respondent explained:                                                       
               The Service will not grant an installment agreement unless             
               the agreement includes all delinquent tax liabilities.  The            
               Service will apply all payments on an agreement in the best            
               interest of the United States.  Generally, payments are                
               applied to the tax period with the earliest collection                 
               statute expiration date.  The trust fund recovery penalty              
               assessment had the earliest collection statute date.                   
               Payments were applied to the trust fund recovery penalty               
               first.                                                                 
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
               The Settlement Officer offered you an opportunity to produce           
               verification of any other designated payments for                      
               consideration for transfer.  You did not provide any                   
               additional canceled checks designated to specific tax                  
               periods.                                                               
          On October 4, 2002, petitioners each filed a Petition for Lien or           
          Levy Action Under Code Section 6320(c) or 6330(d) for the years             
          in issue.                                                                   


               5  Respondent also included taxable years 1997 and 1999 in             
          the Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a            
          Hearing and in Mr. Lah’s notice of determination, but petitioners           
          do not dispute those years.                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011