- 7 - the Mower County district court in Minnesota to seek enforcement of the terms of the divorce decree. We are not unsympathetic to petitioner’s position. However, we are bound by the language of the statute as it is written and the accompanying regulations, when consistent therewith. Michaels v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1412, 1417 (1986). The Internal Revenue Code is clear as to the precise circumstance in which a noncustodial parent becomes entitled to a dependency exemption. See Neal v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1999-97. Respondent is sustained on this issue. 2. Child Tax Credit A taxpayer may be entitled to claim a credit against tax with respect to each “qualifying child”. Sec. 24(a). The term “qualifying child” is defined, among other things, as any individual if “the taxpayer is allowed a deduction under section 151 with respect to such individual for the taxable year”. Sec. 24(c)(1)(A). For the reasons stated above, petitioner is not entitled to a dependency exemption deduction under section 151 with respect to Justin. It therefore follows that petitioner is not entitled to a child tax credit under section 24(a). Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011