Joseph F. Lisi - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
          the absence of a contemporaneous written acknowledgment of the              
          contribution by the donee.  Sec. 170(f)(8); sec. 1.170A-13(f),              
          Income Tax Regs.                                                            
               Petitioner provided substantiation for his payment of State            
          income taxes by the Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, which was             
          attached to his 1999 return and which reflects State income tax             
          withholding in the relevant amount.  Petitioner, however, failed            
          to provide substantiating documents for any of the other itemized           
          deductions, including the claimed cash charitable contributions.            
          Although petitioner’s testimony at trial provided little detail             
          concerning these contributions, he did state that he paid                   
          approximately $300 to each of two charities--his church and the             
          Salvation Army.  These contributions are allowable only in the              
          presence of the required written records.  Sec. 170(a)(1),                  
          (f)(8); sec. 1.170A-13, Income Tax Regs.  Because petitioner has            
          provided no such records, we conclude that he has not met the               
          substantiation requirements for the claimed charitable                      
          contributions and that he is not entitled to any deduction                  
          therefor.  The amount of the remaining claimed deductions for               
          gambling losses and automobile taxes, together with the                     
          substantiated State income tax payment, totals $4,242.  Because             
          the standard deduction of $4,300 exceeds this amount, even if the           
          remaining claimed deductions were substantiated, the itemized               
          deductions would be of no benefit to petitioner.                            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011