- 7 - petitioner’s response by May 9, 2002. Petitioner responded in a letter to Ms. Dodson dated April 30, 2002. Although several exhibits were attached to the letter, none of the exhibits supplied the information requested by Ms. Dodson. Petitioner’s April 30, 2002, letter demanded that respondent pay her “all allowances, credits, standard deductions, benefits 1993 through 2001.” On May 9, 2002, the Appeals Office issued a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) under Section 6320 and/or 6330 in which it determined the following: 1. All legal and procedural requirements for the issuance of the Notice of Intent to Levy had been met. 2. Prior to the Appeals officer’s consideration of the issues raised by petitioner, the Appeals officer had had no previous involvement with respect to petitioner’s 1993 and 1994 income tax liabilities. 3. None of the issues raised by petitioner were meritorious. 4. Petitioner did not raise any spousal defenses. 5. Petitioner was not entitled to challenge the underlying liabilities for 1993 and 1994 because she had received notices of deficiency for those years. 6. The proposed levy action balanced the need for efficient collection of taxes with the legitimate concern of the taxpayerPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011