Carlos Londono - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          monthly installment payments over 60 months and pay off the full            
          cumulative total of the taxes petitioner owed for 1990, 1991, and           
          1992 (the years to which respondent’s levy relates) as well as              
          for 1993 through 1999, a cumulative total of $91,120.                       
               Respondent’s Appeals officer also noted that for the prior             
          10 years petitioner had a poor compliance history with regard to            
          the filing and payment of his Federal income tax liabilities and            
          that petitioner, as of July 3, 2001, still was not current with             
          regard to his Federal income tax liabilities (namely,                       
          petitioner’s 2000 Federal income tax return had not yet been                
          filed, and petitioner’s estimated tax payments for 2001 were not            
          current).                                                                   
               On July 3, 2001, respondent’s Appeals officer discussed on             
          the telephone with petitioner’s representative petitioner’s offer           
          in compromise and explained that the offer in compromise could              
          not be approved because petitioner’s financial information did              
          not demonstrate a genuine doubt as to collectibility of the taxes           
          owed and because of petitioner’s then current and long history of           
          delinquency with regard to his Federal income tax liabilities.              
               On July 18, 2001, petitioner filed with respondent’s Appeals           
          Office his 2000 Federal income tax return and additional                    
          financial information.                                                      
               Respondent’s Appeals officer reviewed the additional                   
          financial information submitted by petitioner and concluded that            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011