- 5 - distributors of Amway products. Petitioners also received unsolicited, independent advice from their accountant, but apparently the advice was negative. Instead of attempting to sell Amway products at a profit to customers/users, petitioners chose to concentrate on developing a network of distributors. Consequently, their potential for profit was almost entirely dependent upon Amway’s performance bonus program and the sales efforts of their downline distributors. Recruiting productive downline distributors, therefore, was the key to petitioners’ profit potential. Nevertheless, they made no effort to develop a profile of a successful downline distributor on which basis they would recruit; instead, petitioners recruited indiscriminately from family, friends, and acquaintances. By the end of 1999, it appears that petitioners had recruited between 10 and 25 downline distributors but had only two regular customers--their neighbor and Mr. Lopez’s mother. The relationship between petitioners and their downline distributors was an informal one. There were no contracts or minimum sales agreements. Downline distributors were free to leave petitioners’ distribution network at will and, if they desired, could even join another Amway distributorship under a different upline distributor. Petitioners were not assigned a sales territory, and, like their downline distributors, they hadPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011