- 2 - After concessions,2 the issues for decision are: (1) How much of an alimony deduction petitioner is entitled to for 1998; (2) whether petitioner is entitled to claim dependency exemptions for his children for 1998; (3) whether petitioner is entitled to claim head of household filing status for 1998; (4) whether petitioner is entitled to deduct any amount for unreimbursed employee business expenses for 1998; and (5) whether petitioner is liable for the addition to tax pursuant to section 6651(a)(1) for 1998. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are 2 Mr. Maher stipulated that he received income in excess of the amount determined by respondent. Respondent stipulated that Mr. Maher had total prepaid Federal income tax credits of $20,894, paid $12,698 in State and local income taxes, and made $400 in charitable contributions for 1998. Respondent conceded that Mr. Maher is entitled to an alimony deduction consisting of one-half of the mortgage payments (principal and interest) he paid, one-half of the real estate taxes he paid, one-half of the homeowners insurance he can prove he paid, and the health and automobile insurance he can prove he paid on behalf of his wife. Respondent conceded that Mr. Maher is entitled to deduct as an itemized deduction the other half of the mortgage interest and real estate taxes paid. At trial and on brief, Mr. Maher did not address the additions to tax pursuant to secs. 6651(a)(2) and 6654(a). Therefore, we find that Mr. Maher abandoned these issues. See Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 683 (1989); Money v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 46, 48 (1987).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011