- 6 -
the computerized lists with a handwritten checkmark placed next
to them. (The other four assets, for which the worksheet reports
the total unrecovered cost as $28,214, appear on the computerized
list without a checkmark.) The checkmarks were made by Laxton
who reviewed the computerized lists during this proceeding and
checked off the assets which petitioner initially asserted were
abandoned. The amounts shown next to the checkmarks and the
amounts shown for the just mentioned four assets correspond in
total to petitioner’s claim that the “unrecovered cost” of the 79
assets totals $246,382 (with rounding).
The Court also admitted into evidence petitioner’s Exhibit
8-P. This exhibit is petitioner’s summary of the identity and
“unrecovered cost” of the: (1) 60 assets which petitioner now
claims were abandoned in 1997 and (2) 17 assets which petitioner
now claims were included in the assets sold in 1995 for $30,000.
Exhibit 8-P lists that the unrecovered costs of the assets
included in these categories were $169,439 and $61,835,
respectively. The difference between the $246,382 shown on
Exhibit 5-J and the $231,274 listed on Exhibit 8-P (i.e.,
$169,439 + $61,835) is attributable to two assets appearing on
the former exhibit but not on the latter.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011