- 8 - expenditure. Petitioners presented no evidence from which the Court could conclude that respondent’s determination was erroneous, and we affirm that determination. The determination with respect to the 1995 mortgage interest is different. Petitioners claimed deductions of $6,764 for 1995 and $7,883 for 1996. Petitioners apparently substantiated the 1996 amount, but could substantiate only $4,101 of the 1995 deduction. Petitioner testified that petitioners had paid the amount deducted. Considering the substantiation of the 1996 deduction and petitioner’s testimony, we believe that it is highly likely that petitioners incurred and paid the amount claimed for 1995. We hold for petitioners on this issue. 3. Negligence Section 6662(a) imposes a penalty with respect “to any portion of an underpayment of tax required to be shown on a return” in an amount “equal to 20 percent of the portion of the underpayment to which this section applies.” Section 6662 applies, inter alia, to underpayments attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations. See sec. 6662(b)(1). “Negligence” includes any failure to make a reasonable attempt to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, and “disregard” includes any careless, reckless, or intentional disregard. Sec. 6662(c). Also, “‘Negligence is a lack of due care or the failure to do what a reasonable and ordinarilyPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011