Charles T. McCord, Jr. and Mary S. McCord, Donors - Page 31

                                       - 13 -                                         
          counsel2 by Howard Frazier Barker Elliott, Inc. (HFBE).  That               
          report (the 1996 HFBE appraisal report) concludes that, taking              
          into account discounts for lack of control and lack of                      
          marketability, the fair market value of a 1-percent “assignee’s             
          interest in the Class B Limited Partnership Interests” on the               
          valuation date was $89,505.                                                 
               Representatives of CFT and the symphony, respectively                  
          (including their respective outside counsel), reviewed the 1996             
          HFBE appraisal report and determined that it was not necessary to           
          obtain their own appraisals.  Furthermore, under the terms of the           
          confirmation agreement, CFT and the symphony (as well as the                
          other assignees) agreed not to seek any judicial alteration of              
          the allocation in the confirmation agreement and waived their               
          arbitration rights granted under the assignment agreement.                  
          MIL’s Exercise of the Call Right                                            
               On June 26, 1996, MIL exercised the call right with respect            
          to the interests held by the symphony and CFT.  It did so                   
          pursuant to a document styled “Agreement-–Exercise of Call Option           
          By McCord Interests, Ltd., L.L.P.” (the exercise agreement).  The           
          purchase price for the redeemed interests was based on a two-page           
          letter from HFBE (the HFBE letter) previewing an updated                    
          appraisal report to be prepared by HFBE.  The HFBE letter                   


               2  The children’s counsel had also represented petitioners             
          in connection with the transaction.  However, petitioners were              
          not involved in the allocation of the gifted interest among the             
          assignees pursuant to the confirmation agreement.                           




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011