Lance A. McLee - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
                                     Background                                       
               The record establishes and/or the parties do not dispute the           
          following.                                                                  
               Petitioner resided in Chesapeake, Virginia, at the time he             
          filed the petition in this case.                                            
               On June 18, 2000, petitioner filed a Federal income tax                
          (tax) return for his taxable year 1997 (return).  In that return,           
          petitioner showed total income of $41,914 consisting of Schedule            
          C net profit, total tax of $11,727, tax due of $8,487, and an               
          estimated tax penalty of $413.  When petitioner filed his return,           
          he did not pay the tax due shown in his 1997 return.                        
               On July 17, 2000, respondent assessed petitioner’s tax, as             
          well as additions to tax and interest provided by law, for his              
          taxable year 1997.2  (We shall refer to those assessed amounts,             
          as well as interest as provided by law accrued after July 17,               
          2000, as petitioner’s unpaid liability for 1997.)                           
               Respondent issued to petitioner the notice and demand for              
          payment required by section 6303(a) with respect to petitioner’s            
          unpaid liability for 1997.                                                  
               On June 28, 2001, respondent issued to petitioner a final              
          notice of intent to levy and notice of your right to a hearing              
          (notice of intent to levy) with respect to petitioner’s unpaid              


               2Respondent assessed petitioner’s tax after correcting the             
          total tax shown in petitioner’s return for mathematical or                  
          computational errors.                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011