Marc A. Mehner - Page 4

                                         -4-                                          
                                       OPINION                                        
               Petitioner asserts that he timely filed his 1997 Federal               
          income tax return, but that it was either lost by the Internal              
          Revenue Service or misplaced by the U.S. Postal Service.  On the            
          basis of this assertion, petitioner concludes that respondent               
          erred in the notice of deficiency in that he determined                     
          petitioner’s tax liability for 1997 “in lieu of the timely filed            
          original tax return” and did not give petitioner “full credit for           
          any allowable deductions under Schedule C.”  Petitioner did not             
          present at trial a copy of his 1997 income tax return that he               
          purportedly mailed to respondent, a proof of its mailing, or                
          evidence as to his entitlement to any deductions not allowed by             
          respondent in the notice of deficiency.                                     
          A.   Burden of Proof                                                        
               The parties agree that the burden of proof as to the                   
          deficiency is on petitioner.  Respondent bears the burden of                
          production as to the additions to tax.  See sec. 7491(c).  In               
          order to meet his burden of production, respondent must present             
          evidence indicating that it is appropriate to impose an addition            
          to tax.  See Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446 (2001).              
          The burden of proof remains with petitioner in that once                    
          respondent comes forward with sufficient evidence that the                  
          relevant penalties or additions to tax are appropriate,                     
          petitioner must come forward with evidence sufficient to persuade           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011