Fortunato J. Mendes - Page 21

                                       - 21 -                                         
          cause.  Petitioner points to a letter from his attorney dated               
          June 14, 1990, in which she states that she is in the process of            
          preparing returns for 1984, 1985, and 1987, and that, upon                  
          completion of those returns, she “will go back and finish 1983 *            
          * *, 1986, 1988 and 1989.”  Both petitioner’s attorney and the              
          Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Philadelphia Service Center later            
          confirmed that she never filed a 1988 return for petitioner.                
               There is no record as to when petitioner might have given              
          his attorney the records needed to prepare his 1988 return.  The            
          fact that, as of June 14, 1990, she had not even begun to prepare           
          the return indicates that petitioner could not have believed in             
          good faith that it would be timely filed by April 17, 1989.                 
          Moreover, even if we were able to find such good faith reliance             
          by petitioner, it would not constitute “reasonable cause” for               
          purposes of section 6651(a).  “The failure to make a timely                 
          filing of a tax return is not excused by the taxpayer’s reliance            
          on an agent, and such reliance is not ‘reasonable cause’ for a              
          late filing under � 6651(a)(1).”  United States v. Boyle, 469               
          U.S. 241, 252 (1985).  Nor did the mere fact of petitioner’s                
          incarceration at the time his 1988 return was due constitute                
          reasonable cause for his failure to file the return.  See                   
          Llorente v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 260, 268-269 (1980), affd. in             
          part and revd. in part on another issue 649 F.2d 152 (2d Cir.               
          1981).  Therefore, we sustain respondent’s imposition of a                  






Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011