Robert James Mentzel, Jr. - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the            
          Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                  
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal             
          income tax of $805 for the taxable year 1998.                               
               The issue for decision is whether petitioner’s son resided             
          with petitioner for more than half of 1998, thereby entitling               
          petitioner to a dependency exemption deduction, to a child tax              
          credit, and to head of household filing status for that year.               
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulations of fact and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in St.           
          Louis, Missouri, on the date the petition was filed in this case.           
               Petitioner and his former wife, Barbara Mentzel (Ms.                   
          Mentzel) were divorced on February 27, 1995.  The divorce decree            
          awarded petitioner and Ms. Mentzel joint legal custody of their             
          son, Robert James Mentzel III (Robert).  The decree, which was              
          prepared using a standardized form, contained provisions                    
          concerning who was to be awarded “primary” physical custody                 
          versus “temporary” physical custody; these provisions had been              
          selected, struck out, and written over in a somewhat unclear                
          manner.  The resulting language provided as follows:                        
               The Petitioner [Ms. Mentzel] and Respondent [petitioner]               
               shall exercise Joint Legal Custody but the Primary                     








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011