Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. & Subsidiaries - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
                    After the first seven of the 1987 cross-chain                     
               sales had closed and shortly before the sale of MLCR                   
               was scheduled to close, the purchaser of MLCR notified                 
               P that it could not own VL, one of MLCR’s subsidiaries                 
               because of Federal law restrictions.  Approximately 2                  
               weeks before the sale of MLCR closed, MLCR sold the                    
               stock of VL to MLAM, a sister corporation, in a                        
               transaction that qualified as a deemed sec. 304,                       
               I.R.C., redemption.                                                    
                    On its consolidated income tax return for TYE                     
               Dec. 26, 1987, P claimed a loss of $466,985,176 from                   
               the sale of MLCR after treating the gross sales                        
               proceeds from the 1987 cross-chain sales as a dividend                 
               and increasing its basis in MLCR’s stock by that                       
               amount.                                                                
                    Respondent determined that the nine cross-chain                   
               sales of Merlease, MLBFS, MLPC, MLVC, MLEI, MLRDM, MLI,                
               MLLE, and VL (the subsidiaries) and the sales of MLL                   
               and MLCR outside the consolidated group were parts of a                
               firm, fixed, and clearly integrated plan to completely                 
               terminate MLL’s and MLCR’s actual and constructive                     
               ownership of the subsidiaries.  Petitioner contends                    
               that each cross-chain sale resulted in the receipt of a                
               dividend by the selling corporation under secs. 302(d)                 
               and 301, I.R.C., equal to the gross sale proceeds and                  
               that it was entitled, under the consolidated return                    
               regulations, to increase its basis in MLL’s and MLCR’s                 
               stock as a result of the cross-chain sales.                            
                    Held: The cross-chain sales qualified as                          
               redemptions in complete termination of MLL’s and MLCR’s                
               interest in the subsidiaries sold cross-chain under                    
               sec. 302(b)(3), I.R.C., and must be taxed as                           
               distributions in exchange for stock under sec. 302(a),                 
               I.R.C., rather than as dividends under sec. 301, I.R.C.                















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011