- 4 - On April 11, 2002, respondent sent petitioners a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330 (the determination letter), in which respondent denied petitioners’ request for relief. On May 14, 2002, petitioners filed a petition for lien or levy action under section 6320(c) or 6330(d). In their petition, petitioners contended only that: (1) Respondent erred in trying to collect from petitioners employment taxes owed by petitioner’s law corporation; and (2) respondent failed to send to their last known address any notice of the Federal tax liens filed in 1992 and 1997. Petitioners did not propose any alternatives to collection in their petition. Respondent filed a motion for summary judgment. The Court ordered petitioners to file a response to respondent’s motion, but they did not do so. Discussion A. Summary Judgment Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation and to avoid the need for expensive trials. Fla. Peach Corp. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 678, 681 (1988). We may grant summary judgment if the pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions, admissions, affidavits, and any other acceptable materials show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and a decision may be rendered as a matter of law. Rule 121(b);Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011