- 9 - because she did not file returns for 1996-98. Respondent’s determination is not made arbitrary or unreasonable because of respondent’s failure to have all the facts if the failure is caused by petitioner. Roberts v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 834, 836- 837 (1974). Petitioner relies on Portillo v. Commissioner, 932 F.2d 1128 (5th Cir. 1991), affg. and revg. in part and remanding T.C. Memo. 1990-68, and Senter v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-311, for the proposition that respondent’s determination is not presumed to be correct unless respondent provides some evidence showing that petitioner received unreported income. Petitioner’s reliance on Portillo and Senter is misplaced. In those cases, the Commissioner’s determination was held to be arbitrary because the Commissioner produced no reliable evidence that the taxpayer received unreported income for the years at issue. In contrast, respondent’s determination in the instant case was based on third-party reports, the accuracy of which petitioner does not dispute. Petitioner contends that respondent’s determination is not supported by any evidence. We disagree. Respondent’s determination was based on information reports from third-party payors. The Commissioner may properly determine a deficiency based on Forms 1099. Parker v. Commissioner, 117 F.3d 785, 787 (5th Cir. 1997). In Parker, the U.S. Court of Appeals for thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011