- 12 - the assets used in the activity may appreciate in value; (5) the success of the taxpayer in carrying on other similar or dissimilar activities; (6) the taxpayer’s history of income or losses with respect to the activity; (7) the amount of occasional profits, if any, which are earned; (8) the financial status of the taxpayer; and (9) elements of personal pleasure or recreation. Section 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners bear the burden of proving that respondent’s determinations in the notice of deficiency are in error. Rule 142(a).3 The parties’ stipulation states that SFIS and petitioner were engaged in “multi-level marketing type activities” with respect to the products of several companies, and that the 1996 and 1997 gross receipts were from commissions and the sale of products. However, petitioners have provided no reliable evidence that any such activities conducted by SFIS or petitioner had the requisite profit objective. The tax returns filed by SFIS are merely uncorroborated assertions, not evidence of any activity. Apart from the generic description in the parties’ stipulation, the only evidence in the record concerning the purported activities is petitioner’s cursory testimony, which we 3Sec. 7491(a) does not shift the burden of proof to respondent in this case because petitioners have provided no credible evidence with respect to the activities of SFIS. Sec. 7491(a)(1).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011