Thomas J. Northen , Jr., and Shirley Cox - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          expenditure.                                                                
               Section 162(a) allows the deduction of all ordinary and                
          necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in              
          carrying on a trade or business.  The cost of incidental repairs            
          to property is deductible if those repairs neither materially add           
          to the value of the property nor appreciably prolong the life of            
          the property.  Sec. 1.162-4, Income Tax Regs.  Repairs in the               
          nature of replacements, to the extent that they arrest                      
          deterioration and appreciably prolong the life of the property,             
          must generally be capitalized and depreciated in accordance with            
          section 167.  Id.  Further, section 263(a) provides that no                 
          deduction shall be allowed for permanent improvements or                    
          betterments made to increase the value of any property.                     
               The issue in this case has been considered previously by               
          this Court in Oberman Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 47 T.C.            
          471 (1967).  In that case, the Court held that the cost of                  
          removing and replacing roof-covering material (as well as the               
          cost of inserting an expansion joint in the roof) was a                     
          deductible expense.  The Court observed that “it is necessary to            
          take into consideration the purpose for which an expenditure is             
          made in order to determine whether such expenditure is capital in           
          nature or constitutes a current expense.”  Id. at 482.  The Court           
          in Oberman Manufacturing Co. further observed that the taxpayer’s           
          only purpose in having the work done was to prevent leakage and             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011