Dale L. Oyer, Transferee, et al. - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          D.   Notices of Federal Tax Liens                                           
               On May 11, 2001, respondent filed notices of Federal tax               
          lien with respect to each petitioner’s transferee liability,                
          showing an $89,079.25 unpaid balance of assessment with respect             
          to each petitioner.  In separate letters dated May 16, 2001,                
          respondent notified each petitioner of this action and of the               
          right to a hearing under section 6320.                                      
          E.   Petitioners’ Requests for Hearings                                     
               Each petitioner timely submitted a Form 12153, Request for a           
          Collection Due Process Hearing.  Attached to these Forms 12153              
          were substantially identical memoranda, asserting that each                 
          asserted tax lien was defective, erroneous, and improper because:           
          (1) The stipulated decision in the corporation’s deficiency case            
          was jurisdictionally defective because the underlying notice of             
          deficiency was invalid in that it determined a deficiency for the           
          corporation’s taxable year ending December 31, 1995, rather than            
          for the corporation’s final taxable period ending August 31,                
          1995; and (2) alternatively, each transferee’s liability should             
          be limited to $19,041, which petitioners seemed to suggest was              
          the maximum value of assets that any of them actually received              
          from the corporation.                                                       
          F.   The Appeals Office Hearings                                            
               On July 25, 2001, an Appeals officer held a telephone                  
          hearing with respect to the collection proceedings against                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011