Filomena Pahamotang - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          the Court that she had no evidence to present and no additional             
          arguments to add to those presented in her response to                      
          respondent’s motion for summary judgment.                                   
                                   FINDINGS OF FACT                                   
               Petitioner and her husband filed their 1994 joint Federal              
          income tax return on April 15, 1995, wherein petitioner’s                   
          occupation was shown as “registered nurse”.  Attached to the                
          return were Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, and a Form 1099-R,           
          Distributions From Pensions Annuities, Retirement or Profit-                
          Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., reflecting a                
          total of $90,017.59 for wages and income payments to petitioner             
          for the 1994 tax year.  Petitioner and her husband reported total           
          joint wages of $105,265.  The 1994 joint return contained a                 
          $42,883 claimed loss on Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business;           
          a $3,000 capital loss on Schedule D, Capital Gains and Losses; a            
          $12,821 loss on Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss; and               
          $57,768 of itemized deductions on Schedule A, Itemized                      
          Deductions, resulting in no reported taxable income.  A refund of           
          $12,067 was claimed, representing a claim for all of the income             
          tax withheld and excess employment taxes.                                   
               Petitioner’s 1994 return reflected her address as 1500 Adams           
          Avenue, Apt. 105, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (Adams Avenue address).              
          During 1998, respondent was in communication with petitioner and            
          was provided with a second address--P.O. Box 11774, Costa Mesa,             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011