Earl R. and Mary A. Palmer - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined a deficiency of $3,255 in petitioners'           
          Federal income tax for 1994.                                                
               The sole issue for decision is whether amounts received by             
          Mary A. Palmer (petitioner) during 1994 from her former husband's           
          military retirement pay are includable in petitioners' gross                
          income under section 61(a)(11).2                                            
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          exhibits annexed thereto, are so found and are incorporated                 
          herein by reference.  Petitioners, husband and wife, were                   
          residents of Round Rock, Texas, at the time the petition was                
          filed.                                                                      
               Petitioner was previously married to Robert V. Simon (Mr.              
          Simon).  They were divorced by a Texas State court on June 27,              
          1977.  At the time of their divorce, petitioner's former spouse,            
          Mr. Simon, was retired from the U.S. Air Force and was receiving            
          military retirement benefits.  Although the record is not clear             
          as to the number of children petitioner and Mr. Simon had, the              
          divorce decree between petitioner and Mr. Simon referred to two             
          children who were under 18 years of age at the time of the                  
          divorce.  Petitioner was designated managing conservator of the             


               2    One other adjustment in the notice of deficiency                  
          relates to the taxable portion of Social Security benefits                  
          petitioners received during 1994.  This is a computational                  
          adjustment that will be resolved by the Court's holding on the              
          retirement pay question.                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011