- 14 - issue of law and an issue of fact. The issue of law is whether 2618's transfer of the club to JKP, in November 1990, constituted a taxable liquidation of 2618, under section 331, or a tax-free reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(D) and/or (F). On that issue, we hold that such transfer constituted a tax-free reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(D). See discussion, infra section III. The issue of fact is whether, in connection with such transfer of assets from 2618 to JKP, we should accept respondent’s argument that petitioner received $40,011 of assets taxable to him as a long-term capital gain pursuant to section 356(a)(1)(B) and (2), or petitioner’s argument that he received nothing. The only evidence offered by respondent in support of his position is the 1989 yearend balance sheet in Schedule L of 2618's 1989 return, which shows $40,011 of assets. The 1989 return for 2618 is a joint, stipulated exhibit. As discussed, infra section III, we find such balance sheet to be supportive of petitioner’s position (reflected in his oral testimony) that he received nothing in connection with the November 1990, transfer of the club from 2618 to JKP rather than of respondent’s position. C. Lack of Need To Assign Burden of Proof Because we are able to dispose of both issues on the basis of undisputed or stipulated facts, we need not resolve the burden of proof issue raised by petitioner. See Deskins v.Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011