Pepper Pot Trust, David-Keith Jacobs, Trustee - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          procedure have been met.  However, section 6330(c)(1) does not              
          specify which document the Commissioner must use (e.g., the                 
          summary record rather than a transcript of account) to satisfy              
          the verification requirement.  Kuglin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.           
          2002-51.  Even though Jacobs requested that respondent provide              
          Forms 23C, it was not an abuse of discretion for respondent to              
          give him Forms 4340 to verify the assessments.  See Hughes v.               
          United States, 953 F.2d 531, 535-536 (9th Cir. 1992); Roberts v.            
          Commissioner, 118 T.C. 365, 371 (2002), affd. 329 F.3d 1224 (11th           
          Cir. 2003); Nestor v. Commissioner, supra at 166.                           
               We conclude that the trusts’ positions are frivolous and               
          that they maintained these proceedings primarily for delay.  We             
          will require each trust to pay to the United States a $5,000                
          penalty under section 6673(a).                                              
               Accordingly,                                                           
                                                  Appropriate orders of               
                                             dismissal and decision will              
                                             be entered.                              
















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  

Last modified: May 25, 2011