- 9 - Respondent treated petitioner's request for relief as an election under section 6015(f) and determined that petitioner was not entitled to the requested relief. Section 6015(e)(1) allows a taxpayer whose request for relief is denied by respondent to petition this Court for a review of such determination. Our jurisdiction in cases brought under section 6015(e)(1) encompasses a review of respondent's determination with respect to all relief afforded by section 6015. Ewing v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 494, 497-507 (2002); Fernandez v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 324, 330-331 (2000); Butler v. Commissioner, supra at 289-290. This Court treats petitioner's request as a request for equitable relief under section 6015(f), that she be relieved of her obligation to pay any outstanding tax liability reported on their 1994 joint return. To prevail, petitioner must prove that respondent's denial of equitable relief from joint liability under section 6015(f) was an abuse of discretion.3 Jonson v. 3 RRA 1998 sec. 3001, 112 Stat. 726, added sec. 7491, which shifts the burden of proof to the Secretary in certain circumstances. Sec. 7491, however, is applicable to "court proceedings arising in connection with examinations commencing after the date of the enactment of this Act." RRA 1998 sec. 3001(c), 112 Stat. 727. Sec. 7491 is inapplicable to this case. See Warbelow's Air Ventures, Inc. v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 579, 582 n.8 (2002) (sec. 7491 is effective for court proceedings arising in connection with examinations commencing after July 22, 1998).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011