Gavin Polone - Page 20

                                       - 20 -                                         
               occurring within UTA, which were undertaken by or with                 
               the authorization and ratification of, defendants                      
               BENEDEK, BERKUS, STEVENS, ZIMMER, and COSAY.  Over a                   
               period of several months, Plaintiff made known to                      
               defendants BENEDEK, BERKUS, STEVENS, ZIMMER, and COSAY                 
               Plaintiff’s concerns that these acts and practices were                
               wrongful and/or illegal and could expose UTA to                        
               liability, condemnation within the industry, loss of                   
               clients, and general damage and harm.  * * * The acts                  
               and practices about which Plaintiff complained                         
               included, but were not limited to, the following:                      
                         A.  The defrauding of UTA clients through                    
               misrepresentation that commission rates were in most                   
               instances non-negotiable at 10% and uniform for all                    
               clients, while in truth, UTA agreed to special reduced                 
               commission deals with selected and favored clients;                    
               *     *     *     *     *     *     *                                  
                         D.  Illegally recording, as phony “loans”                    
               that were interest-free and never intended to be paid                  
               back to UTA, payments made by UTA to [names redacted]                  
               to cover country club fees, among other things, so as                  
               to disguise income to said persons for tax purposes;                   
               and                                                                    
                         E.  Condoning and tolerating illegal use of                  
               controlled substances by UTA employees * * * and by one                
               member of the [redacted] who participated in the                       
               illegal use of drugs with other employees of UTA at a                  
               company retreat.                                                       
                    16.  In response to Plaintiff’s complaints about                  
               their improper and illegal conduct, defendants BENEDEK,                
               BERKUS, STEVENS, ZIMMER, and COSAY failed to put a stop                
               to the conduct and, in fact, gave every indication that                
               the conduct would continue.                                            
               *     *     *     *     *     *     *                                  
                    21.  * * * the conduct [of Mr. Polone] alleged [by                
               UTA] was not at variance with and in no instances worse                
               than the standards of conduct tolerated at UTA by                      
               defendants in view of the fact that defendants had                     
               themselves routinely committed sexual, for example,                    
               misconduct in connection with their employment,                        
               including sexual liaisons between [name redacted] and                  
               various subordinate employees of UTA, and unwelcome                    




Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011