Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. - Page 17




                                       - 16 -                                         
          to satisfy the objective portion of the worthlessness test.                 
          Thus, the Court finds that sufficient factors objectively support           
          the worthlessness of petitioner's covenants not to compete.  See            
          Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra (An act of            
          Congress rendered motor carrier authorities worthless because all           
          rights associated with the authorities were eliminated).  As a              
          result, the Court finds that all three of petitioner's covenants            
          not to compete became worthless on the date the prohibitory                 
          injunction was issued.                                                      
               Respondent argues that ABCO Oil Corp. v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 1990-40, controls the outcome of this case.  In ABCO Oil              
          Corp., the taxpayer purchased some of a competitor's assets.                
          And, in a related but separate agreement, the taxpayer entered              
          into individual 5-year noncompetition agreements with three of              
          the competitor's shareholders.  Two of the three covenantees died           
          before the end of the 5-year noncompetition period.  The taxpayer           
          deducted the amounts it still owed to the deceased covenantees.             
          The taxpayer argued that the noncompetition agreements became               
          worthless and that the deduction should be allowed pursuant to              
          section 1.167(a)-8(a)(3), Income Tax Regs.  The Court in ABCO Oil           
          Corp. held that the death of the covenantees did not make the               
          covenants worthless; rather, the covenantees' "deaths extended              
          forever the duration of noncompetition."  Id.  Respondent argues            
          that ABCO Oil Corp. controls the decision in this case because of           






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011