River City Ranches #1 Ltd., Leon Shepard, Tax Matters Partner - Page 107

                                        - 92 -                                         
          to the date upon which respondent issued each partnership the                
          FPAA for that year, but for Jay Hoyt (the TMP) and the IRS’s                 
          having executed timely an extension or a series of extensions                
          that extended the period of limitations beyond the date upon                 
          which the FPAA was issued.                                                   
               The parties disagree solely over whether the extensions that            
          Jay Hoyt executed for the taxable years set forth supra p. 83,               
          are valid and bind the partners of the partnership.  Except for              
          the extension concerning the 1984 taxable year of RCR #4, these              
          extensions concern post-1986 partnership taxable years and were              
          executed by Jay Hoyt and the IRS on various dates from February              
          1991 through March 1993.  Jay Hoyt and the IRS executed the                  
          extension concerning RCR #4’s 1984 taxable year on August 1,                 
          1987.                                                                        
               The Court rejects petitioners’ contention that section                  
          301.6231(c)-5T, Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., supra, requires            
          the IRS automatically to end the partnership treatment of the                
          items of any TMP whenever a criminal tax investigation of that               
          TMP is commenced.  The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit                
          affirmed this Court’s determination in Phillips v. Commissioner,             
          114 T.C. 115 (2000), that such an interpretation of the temporary            
          regulation is improper, because it would require reading the                 
          first sentence of the temporary regulation in isolation, divorced            
          from the other two sentences of the regulation as a whole.                   






Page:  Previous  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011